Part B—State Assessment Grants
Editorial Notes
Codification
Part B of title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, comprising this part, was originally enacted in the general amendment of title I of
§6361. Grants for State assessments and related activities
(a) Grants authorized
From amounts made available in accordance with
(1) To pay the costs of the development of the State assessments and standards adopted under
(2) If a State has developed the assessments adopted under
(A) Ensuring the provision of appropriate accommodations available to English learners and children with disabilities to improve the rates of inclusion in regular assessments of such children, including professional development activities to improve the implementation of such accommodations in instructional practice.
(B) Developing challenging State academic standards and aligned assessments in academic subjects for which standards and assessments are not required under
(C) Developing or improving assessments for English learners, including assessments of English language proficiency as required under
(D) Ensuring the continued validity and reliability of State assessments.
(E) Refining State assessments to ensure their continued alignment with the challenging State academic standards and to improve the alignment of curricula and instructional materials.
(F) Developing or improving balanced assessment systems that include summative, interim, and formative assessments, including supporting local educational agencies in developing or improving such assessments.
(G) At the discretion of the State, refining science assessments required under
(H) Developing or improving models to measure and assess student progress or student growth on State assessments under
(I) Developing or improving assessments for children with disabilities, including alternate assessments aligned to alternate academic achievement standards for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities described in
(J) Allowing for collaboration with institutions of higher education, other research institutions, or other organizations to improve the quality, validity, and reliability of State academic assessments beyond the requirements for such assessments described in
(K) Measuring student academic achievement using multiple measures of student academic achievement from multiple sources.
(L) Evaluating student academic achievement through the development of comprehensive academic assessment instruments (such as performance and technology-based academic assessments, computer adaptive assessments, projects, or extended performance task assessments) that emphasize the mastery of standards and aligned competencies in a competency-based education model.
(M) Designing the report cards and reports under
(i) does not reveal personally identifiable information about an individual student; and
(ii) is derived from existing State and local reporting requirements.
(b) Rule of construction
Nothing in subsection (a)(2)(M) shall be construed as authorizing, requiring, or allowing any additional reporting requirements, data elements, or information to be reported to the Secretary unless such reporting, data, or information is explicitly authorized under this chapter.
(c) Annual report
Each State educational agency receiving a grant under this section shall submit an annual report to the Secretary describing the State's activities under the grant and the result of such activities.
(
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 6361,
Another prior section 6361,
A prior section 1201 of
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of
§6362. State option to conduct assessment system audit
(a) In general
From the amount reserved under
(1) in the case of a grant awarded under this section to a State for the first time—
(A) audit State assessment systems and ensure that local educational agencies audit local assessments under subsection (e)(1);
(B) execute the State plan under subsection (e)(3)(D); and
(C) award subgrants under subsection (f); and
(2) in the case of a grant awarded under this section to a State that has previously received a grant under this section—
(A) execute the State plan under subsection (e)(3)(D); and
(B) award subgrants under subsection (f).
(b) Minimum amount
Each State that receives a grant under this section shall receive an annual grant amount of not less than $1,500,000.
(c) Reallocation
If a State chooses not to apply for a grant under this section, the Secretary shall reallocate such grant amount to other States in accordance with the formula described in
(d) Application
A State desiring to receive a grant under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary shall require. The application shall include a description of—
(1) in the case of a State that is receiving a grant under this section for the first time—
(A) the audit the State will carry out under subsection (e)(1); and
(B) the stakeholder feedback the State will seek in designing such audit;
(2) in the case of a State that is not receiving a grant under this section for the first time, the plan described in subsection (e)(3)(D); and
(3) how the State will award subgrants to local educational agencies under subsection (f).
(e) Audits of State assessment systems and local assessments
(1) Audit requirements
Not later than 1 year after the date a State receives an initial grant under this section, the State shall—
(A) conduct a State assessment system audit as described in paragraph (3);
(B) ensure that each local educational agency receiving funds under this section—
(i) conducts an audit of local assessments administered by the local educational agency as described in paragraph (4); and
(ii) submits the results of such audit to the State; and
(C) report the results of each State and local educational agency audit conducted under subparagraphs (A) and (B), in a format that is widely accessible and publicly available.
(2) Resources for local educational agencies
In carrying out paragraph (1)(B), each State shall provide local educational agencies with resources, such as guidelines and protocols, to assist in conducting and reporting audit results.
(3) State assessment system description
Each State assessment system audit conducted under paragraph (1)(A) shall include—
(A) the schedule for the administration of all State assessments;
(B) for each State assessment—
(i) the purpose for which the assessment was designed and the purpose for which the assessment is used; and
(ii) the legal authority for the administration of the assessment;
(C) feedback on such system from stakeholders, which shall include information such as—
(i) how teachers, principals, other school leaders, and administrators use assessment data to improve and differentiate instruction;
(ii) the timing of release of assessment data;
(iii) the extent to which assessment data is presented in an accessible and understandable format for all stakeholders;
(iv) the opportunities, resources, and training teachers, principals, other school leaders, and administrators are given to review assessment results and make effective use of assessment data;
(v) the distribution of technological resources and personnel necessary to administer assessments;
(vi) the amount of time teachers spend on assessment preparation and administration;
(vii) the assessments that administrators, teachers, principals, other school leaders, parents, and students, if appropriate, do and do not find useful; and
(viii) other information as appropriate; and
(D) a plan, based on the information gathered as a result of the activities described in subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), to improve and streamline the State assessment system, including activities such as—
(i) eliminating any unnecessary assessments, which may include paying the cost associated with terminating procurement contracts;
(ii) supporting the dissemination of best practices from local educational agencies or other States that have successfully improved assessment quality and efficiency to improve teaching and learning; and
(iii) supporting local educational agencies or consortia of local educational agencies to carry out efforts to streamline local assessment systems and implement a regular process of review and evaluation of assessment use in local educational agencies.
(4) Local assessment description
An audit of local assessments conducted in accordance with paragraph (1)(B)(i) shall include the same information described in paragraph (3) that is required of a State audit, except that such information shall be included as applicable to the local educational agency and the local assessments.
(f) Subgrants to local educational agencies
(1) In general
Each State shall reserve not less than 20 percent of the grant funds awarded to the State under this section to make subgrants to local educational agencies in the State or consortia of such local educational agencies, based on demonstrated need in the agency's or consortium's application, to enable such agencies or consortia to improve assessment quality and use, and alignment, including, if applicable, alignment to the challenging State academic standards.
(2) Local educational agency application
Each local educational agency, or consortium of local educational agencies, seeking a subgrant under this subsection shall submit an application to the State at such time, in such manner, and containing such other information as determined necessary by the State. The application shall include a description of the agency's or consortium's needs relating to the improvement of assessment quality, use, and alignment.
(3) Use of funds
A subgrant awarded under this subsection to a local educational agency or consortium of such agencies may be used to—
(A) conduct an audit of local assessments under subsection (e)(1)(B)(i);
(B) carry out the plan described in subsection (e)(3)(D) as it pertains to such agency or consortium;
(C) improve assessment delivery systems and schedules, including by increasing access to technology and assessment proctors, where appropriate;
(D) hire instructional coaches, or promote teachers who may receive increased compensation to serve as instructional coaches, to support teachers in the development of classroom-based assessments, interpreting assessment data, and designing instruction;
(E) provide for appropriate accommodations to maximize inclusion of children with disabilities and English learners participating in assessments; and
(F) improve the capacity of teachers, principals, and other school leaders to disseminate assessment data in an accessible and understandable format for parents and families, including for children with disabilities and English learners.
(g) Definitions
In this section:
(1) Local assessment
The term "local assessment" means an academic assessment selected and carried out by a local educational agency that is separate from an assessment required under
(2) State
The term "State" means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 6362,
Another prior section 6362,
A prior section 1202 of
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of
§6363. Allotment of appropriated funds
(a) Amounts equal to or less than trigger amount
From amounts made available for each fiscal year under subsection 1 6302(b) of this title that are equal to or less than the amount described in
(1) reserve one-half of 1 percent for the Bureau of Indian Education;
(2) reserve one-half of 1 percent for the outlying areas;
(3) reserve not more than 20 percent to carry out
(4) from the remainder, carry out
(A) $3,000,000, except for a fiscal year for which the amounts available are insufficient to allocate such amount to each State, the Secretary shall ratably reduce such amount for each State; and
(B) with respect to any amounts remaining after the allocation under subparagraph (A), an amount that bears the same relationship to such total remaining amounts as the number of students aged 5 through 17 in the State (as determined by the Secretary on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data) bears to the total number of such students in all States.
(b) Amounts above trigger amount
For any fiscal year for which the amount made available for a fiscal year under subsection 1 6302(b) of this title exceeds the amount described in
(1) Competitive grants
(A) In general
The Secretary shall first use such funds to award grants, on a competitive basis, to State educational agencies or consortia of State educational agencies that have submitted applications described in subparagraph (B) to enable such States to carry out the activities described in subparagraphs (C), (H), (I), (J), (K), and (L) of
(B) Applications
A State, or a consortium of States, that desires a competitive grant under subparagraph (A) shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may reasonably require. The application shall demonstrate that the requirements of this section will be met for the uses of funds described under subparagraph (A).
(C) Amount of competitive grants
In determining the amount of a grant under subparagraph (A), the Secretary shall ensure that a State or consortium's grant, as the case may be, shall include an amount that bears the same relationship to the total funds available to carry out this subsection for the fiscal year as the number of students aged 5 through 17 in the State, or, in the case of a consortium, in each State that comprises the consortium, (as determined by the Secretary on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data) bears to the total number of such students in all States.
(2) Allotments
Any amounts remaining after the Secretary awards funds under paragraph (1) shall be allotted to each State, or consortium of States, that did not receive a grant under such paragraph, in an amount that bears the same relationship to the remaining amounts as the number of students aged 5 through 17 in the State, or, in the case of a consortium, in the States of the consortium, (as determined by the Secretary on the basis of the most recent satisfactory data) bears to the total number of such students in all States.
(c) State defined
In this part, the term "State" means each of the 50 States, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
(d) Prohibition
In making funds available to States under this part, the Secretary shall comply with the prohibitions described in
(
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 6363,
Another prior section 6363,
A prior section 1203 of
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of
1 So in original. Probably should be "section".
§6364. Innovative assessment and accountability demonstration authority
(a) Innovative assessment system defined
The term "innovative assessment system" means a system of assessments that may include—
(1) competency-based assessments, instructionally embedded assessments, interim assessments, cumulative year-end assessments, or performance-based assessments that combine into an annual summative determination for a student, which may be administered through computer adaptive assessments; and
(2) assessments that validate when students are ready to demonstrate mastery or proficiency and allow for differentiated student support based on individual learning needs.
(b) Demonstration authority
(1) In general
The Secretary may provide a State educational agency, or a consortium of State educational agencies, in accordance with paragraph (3), with the authority to establish an innovative assessment system (referred to in this section as "demonstration authority").
(2) Demonstration period
In accordance with the requirements described in subsection (e), each State educational agency, or consortium of State educational agencies, that submits an application under this section shall propose in its application the period of time over which the State educational agency or consortium desires to exercise the demonstration authority, except that such period shall not exceed 5 years.
(3) Initial demonstration authority and expansion
During the first 3 years that the Secretary provides State educational agencies and consortia with demonstration authority (referred to in this section as the "initial demonstration period") the Secretary shall provide such demonstration authority to—
(A) a total number of not more than 7 participating State educational agencies, including those participating in consortia, that have applications approved under subsection (e); and
(B) consortia that include not more than 4 State educational agencies.
(c) Progress report
(1) In general
Not later than 180 days after the end of the initial demonstration period, and prior to providing additional State educational agencies with demonstration authority, the Director of the Institute of Education Sciences, in consultation with the Secretary, shall publish a report detailing the initial progress of innovative assessment systems carried out through demonstration authority under this section.
(2) Criteria
The progress report under paragraph (1) shall be based on the annual information submitted by participating States described in subsection (e)(2)(B)(ix) and examine the extent to which—
(A) with respect to each innovative assessment system—
(i) the State educational agency has solicited feedback from teachers, principals, other school leaders, and parents about their satisfaction with the innovative assessment system;
(ii) teachers, principals, and other school leaders have demonstrated a commitment and capacity to implement or continue to implement the innovative assessment system; and
(iii) substantial evidence exists demonstrating that the innovative assessment system has been developed in accordance with the requirements of subsection (e); and
(B) each State with demonstration authority has demonstrated that—
(i) the same innovative assessment system was used to measure the achievement of all students that participated in the innovative assessment system; and
(ii) of the total number of all students, and the total number of each of the subgroups of students defined in
(3) Use of report
Upon completion of the progress report, the Secretary shall provide a response to the findings of the progress report, including a description of how the findings of the report will be used—
(A) to support State educational agencies with demonstration authority through technical assistance; and
(B) to inform the peer-review process described in subsection (f) for advising the Secretary on the awarding of the demonstration authority to the additional State educational agencies described in subsection (d).
(4) Publicly available
The Secretary shall make the progress report under this subsection and the response described in paragraph (3) publicly available on the website of the Department.
(5) Prohibition
The Secretary shall not require States that have demonstration authority to submit any information for the purposes of the progress report that is in addition to the information the State is already required to provide under subsection (e)(2)(B)(x).
(d) Expansion of the demonstration authority
Upon completion and publication of the report described in subsection (c), the Secretary may grant demonstration authority to additional State educational agencies or consortia that submit an application under subsection (e). Such State educational agencies or consortia of State educational agencies shall be subject to all of the same terms, conditions, and requirements of this section.
(e) Application
(1) In general
A State educational agency, or consortium of State educational agencies, that desires to participate in the program of demonstration authority under this section shall submit an application to the Secretary at such time and in such manner as the Secretary may reasonably require.
(2) Contents
Such application shall include a description of the innovative assessment system, the experience the applicant has in implementing any components of the innovative assessment system, and the timeline over which the State or consortium proposes to exercise the demonstration authority. In addition, the application shall include each of the following:
(A) A demonstration that the innovative assessment system will—
(i) meet all the requirements of
(ii) be aligned to the challenging State academic standards and address the depth and breadth of such standards;
(iii) express student results or student competencies in terms consistent with the State's aligned academic achievement standards under
(iv) generate results that are valid and reliable, and comparable, for all students and for each subgroup of students described in
(v) be developed in collaboration with—
(I) stakeholders representing the interests of children with disabilities, English learners, and other vulnerable children;
(II) teachers, principals, and other school leaders;
(III) local educational agencies;
(IV) parents; and
(V) civil rights organizations in the State;
(vi) be accessible to all students, such as by incorporating the principles of universal design for learning;
(vii) provide teachers, principals, other school leaders, students, and parents with timely data, disaggregated by each subgroup of students described in
(viii) identify which students are not making progress toward the challenging State academic standards so that teachers can provide instructional support and targeted interventions to all students;
(ix) annually measure the progress of not less than the same percentage of all students and students in each of the subgroups of students, as defined in
(x) generate an annual, summative achievement determination, based on the aligned State academic achievement standards under
(xi) allow the State educational agency to validly and reliably aggregate data from the innovative assessment system for purposes of—
(I) accountability, consistent with the requirements of
(II) reporting, consistent with the requirements of
(B) A description of how the State educational agency will—
(i) continue use of the statewide academic assessments required under
(ii) identify the distinct purposes for each assessment that is part of the innovative assessment system;
(iii) provide support and training to local educational agency and school staff to implement the innovative assessment system described in this subsection;
(iv) inform parents of students in participating local educational agencies about the innovative assessment system at the beginning of each school year during which the innovative assessment system will be implemented;
(v) engage and support teachers in developing and scoring assessments that are part of the innovative assessment system, including through the use of high-quality professional development, standardized and calibrated scoring rubrics, and other strategies, consistent with relevant nationally recognized professional and technical standards, to ensure inter-rater reliability and comparability;
(vi) acclimate students to the innovative assessment system;
(vii) ensure that students with the most significant cognitive disabilities may be assessed with alternate assessments consistent with
(viii) if the State is proposing to administer the innovative assessment system initially in a subset of local educational agencies, scale up the innovative assessment system to administer such system statewide, or with additional local educational agencies, in the State's proposed demonstration authority period;
(ix) gather data, solicit regular feedback from teachers, principals, other school leaders, and parents, and assess the results of each year of the program of demonstration authority under this section, and respond by making needed changes to the innovative assessment system; and
(x) report data from the innovative assessment system annually to the Secretary, including—
(I) demographics of participating local educational agencies, if such system is not statewide, and additional local educational agencies if added to the system during the course of the State's demonstration authority period or 2-year extension, except that such data shall not reveal any personally identifiable information, including a description of how the inclusion of additional local educational agencies contributes to progress toward achieving high-quality and consistent implementation across demographically diverse local educational agencies throughout the demonstration authority period;
(II) the performance of all participating students, and for each subgroup of students defined in
(III) feedback from teachers, principals, other school leaders, and parents about their satisfaction with the innovative assessment system; and
(IV) if such system is not statewide, a description of the State's progress in scaling up the innovative assessment system to additional local educational agencies during the State's demonstration authority period, as described in clause (viii).
(C) A description of the State educational agency's plan to—
(i) ensure that all students and each of the subgroups of students defined in
(ii) ensure that each local educational agency has the technological infrastructure to implement the innovative assessment system; and
(iii) hold all schools in the local educational agencies participating in the program of demonstration authority accountable for meeting the State's expectations for student achievement.
(D) If the innovative assessment system will initially be administered in a subset of local educational agencies—
(i) a description of the local educational agencies within the State educational agency that will participate, including what criteria the State has for approving any additional local educational agencies to participate during the demonstration authority period;
(ii) assurances from such local educational agencies that such agencies will comply with the requirements of this subsection;
(iii) a description of how the State will—
(I) ensure that the inclusion of additional local educational agencies contributes to progress toward achieving high-quality and consistent implementation across demographically diverse local educational agencies during the demonstration authority period; and
(II) ensure that the participating local educational agencies, as a group, will be demographically similar to the State as a whole by the end of the State's demonstration authority period; and
(iv) a description of the State educational agency's plan to hold all students and each of the subgroups of students, as defined in
(f) Peer review
The Secretary shall—
(1) implement a peer-review process to inform—
(A) the awarding of demonstration authority under this section and the approval to operate an innovative assessment system for the purposes of subsections (b)(2) and (c) of
(B) determinations about whether an innovative assessment system—
(i) is comparable to the State assessments under
(ii) provides an unbiased, rational, and consistent determination of progress toward the goals described under
(2) ensure that the peer-review team consists of practitioners and experts who are knowledgeable about the innovative assessment system being proposed for all participating students, including—
(A) individuals with past experience developing systems of assessment innovation that support all students, including English learners, children with disabilities, and disadvantaged students; and
(B) individuals with experience implementing innovative assessment and accountability systems;
(3) make publicly available the applications submitted under subsection (c) 1 and the peer-review comments and recommendations regarding such applications;
(4) make a determination and inform the State regarding approval or disapproval of the application under subsection (c) 1 not later than 90 days after receipt of the complete application;
(5) if the Secretary disapproves an application under paragraph (4), offer the State an opportunity to—
(A) revise and resubmit such application within 60 days of the disapproval determination; and
(B) submit additional evidence that the State's application meets the requirements of subsection (c); 1 and
(6) make a determination regarding application approval or disapproval of a resubmitted application under paragraph (5) not later than 45 days after receipt of the resubmitted application.
(g) Extension
The Secretary may extend an authorization of demonstration authority under this section for an additional 2 years if the State educational agency demonstrates with evidence that the State educational agency's innovative assessment system is continuing to meet the requirements of subsection (c), including by demonstrating a plan for, and the capacity to, transition to statewide use of the innovative assessment system by the end of the 2-year extension period.
(h) Use of innovative assessment system
A State may, during the State's approved demonstration authority period or 2-year extension, include results from the innovative assessment systems developed under this section in accountability determinations for each student in the participating local educational agencies instead of, or in addition to, results from the assessment system under
(i) Withdrawal of authority
The Secretary shall withdraw the authorization for demonstration authority provided to a State educational agency under this section and such State shall return to use of the statewide assessment system under
(1) meets the requirements under subsection (c);
(2) includes all students attending schools participating in the innovative assessment system in a State that has demonstration authority, including each of the subgroups of students, as defined under
(3) provides an unbiased, rational, and consistent determination of progress toward the goals described under
(4) presents a high-quality plan to transition to full statewide use of the innovative assessment system by the end of the State's approved demonstration authority period or 2-year extension, if the innovative assessment system will initially be administered in a subset of local educational agencies; and
(5) demonstrates comparability to the statewide assessments under
(j) Transition
(1) In general
(A) Operation of innovative assessment system
If, after a State's approved demonstration authority period or 2-year extension, the State educational agency has met all the requirements of this section, including having scaled the innovative assessment system up to statewide use, and demonstrated that such system is of high quality, as described in subparagraph (B), the State shall be permitted to operate the innovative assessment system approved under the program of demonstration authority under this section for the purposes of subsections (b)(2) and (c) of
(B) High quality
Such system shall be considered of high quality if the Secretary, through the peer-review process described in
(i) the innovative assessment system meets all of the requirements of this section;
(ii) the State has examined the effects of the system on other measures of student success, including indicators in the accountability system under
(iii) the innovative assessment system provides coherent and timely information about student achievement based on the challenging State academic standards, including objective measurement of academic achievement, knowledge, and skills that are valid, reliable, and consistent with relevant, nationally-recognized professional and technical standards;
(iv) the State has solicited feedback from teachers, principals, other school leaders, and parents about their satisfaction with the innovative assessment system; and
(v) the State has demonstrated that the same innovative assessment system was used to measure—
(I) the achievement of all students that participated in such innovative assessment system; and
(II) not less than the percentage of such students overall and in each of the subgroups of students, as defined in
(2) Baseline
For the purposes of the evaluation described in paragraph (1), the baseline year shall be considered the first year that each local educational agency in the State used the innovative assessment system.
(3) Waiver authority
A State may request, and the Secretary shall review such request and may grant, a delay of the withdrawal of authority under subsection (i) for the purpose of providing the State with the time necessary to implement the innovative assessment system statewide, if, at the conclusion of the State's approved demonstration authority period and 2-year extension—
(A) the State has met all of the requirements of this section, except transition to full statewide use of the innovative assessment system; and
(B) the State continues to comply with the other requirements of this section, and demonstrates a high-quality plan for transition to statewide use of the innovative assessment system in a reasonable period of time.
(k) Available funds
A State may use funds available under
(l) Consortium
A consortium of States may apply to participate in the program of demonstration authority under this section, and the Secretary may provide each State member of such consortium with such authority if each such State member meets all of the requirements of this section. Such consortium shall be subject to the limitation described in subsection (b)(3)(B) during the initial 3 years of the demonstration authority.
(m) Dissemination of best practices
(1) In general
Following the publication of the progress report described in subsection (c), the Director of the Institute of Education Sciences, in consultation with the Secretary, shall collect and disseminate the best practices on the development and implementation of innovative assessment systems that meet the requirements of this section, including best practices regarding the development of—
(A) summative assessments that—
(i) meet the requirements of
(ii) are comparable with statewide assessments under
(iii) include assessment tasks that determine proficiency or mastery of State-approved competencies aligned to challenging State academic standards;
(B) effective supports for local educational agencies and school staff to implement innovative assessment systems;
(C) effective engagement and support of teachers in developing and scoring assessments and the use of high-quality professional development;
(D) effective supports for all students, particularly each of the subgroups of students, as defined in
(E) standardized and calibrated scoring rubrics, and other strategies, to ensure inter-rater reliability and comparability of determinations of mastery or proficiency across local educational agencies and the State.
(2) Publication
The Secretary shall make the information described in paragraph (1) available on the website of the Department and shall publish an update to the information not less often than once every 3 years.
(
Editorial Notes
Prior Provisions
A prior section 6364,
Another prior section 6364,
Prior sections 6365 to 6368 were omitted in the general amendment of this part by
Section 6365,
Another prior section 6365,
Section 6366,
Another prior section 6366,
Section 6367,
Another prior section 6367,
Section 6368,
Another prior section 6368,
Prior sections 6369, 6369a, 6369b, and 6370 were omitted in the general amendment of this subchapter by
Section 6369,
Section 6369a,
Section 6369b,
Section 6370,
Prior sections 6371 to 6376, 6381 to 6381k, and 6383 were omitted in the general amendment of this part by
Section 6371,
Section 6372,
Section 6373,
Section 6374,
Section 6375,
Section 6376,
Section 6381,
Section 6381a,
Section 6381b,
Section 6381c,
Section 6381d,
Section 6381e,
Section 6381f,
Section 6381g,
Section 6381h,
Section 6381i,
Section 6381j,
Section 6381k,
Section 6383,
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date
Section effective Dec. 10, 2015, except with respect to certain noncompetitive programs and competitive programs, see section 5 of